Following Euclid’s “rule”, the golden number (or golden section, mean, or ratio, or divine proportion, etc.) arises “when a line segment of length x (>1) is divided into two pieces of lengths 1 and x-1, such that the whole length is to 1, as 1 is to the remaining piece, x-1”. This produces the equation x2 - x -1 = 0, of which f = (1+√5)/2» 1.618 is the positive solution. Note that f2 - f -1 = 0 implies f-1= 1/f » 0.618, which is a solution of x2 + x  - 1 = 0. Recent discoveries of a pentagonal structure in quasi-crystals and DNA-structure, justified the introduction of a “golden angle” of 36°, as sin(2×36°)/sin(36°)=f. While the pentagonal property may be the reason for the occurrence of the golden number in elementary geometry, population growth models may appeal on the number since f2 = f +1, implying that the arithmetical progression 1, f, 1+f, ...  is a geometrical one as well. Furthermore, the ratio is f, and since the proportion of consecutive Fibonacci terms 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, … tends to f as well, the occurrence of f in many unpretentious proportions of 2 to 3, 3 to 5 etcetera is not surprising. Nevertheless, when the context is different from artistic proportions or population growth, f's apparition may still come as a surprise. For instance, when gears allow to reach the consecutive speeds v1, v2, v3, … it seems natural to require that this increase in velocity uses the same proportion, while technical cog wheels constructions may lead to an addition property of these speeds (see, Huylebrouck, 2002). Thus, the v1, v2, v3, … should be arithmetical and geometrical, that is,  v2 = fv1, and v3 = fv2 = v1 + v2 (see Fig. 1).

 

 

 

 

Fig. 1 :  A cogwheel for adding golden gears, and the Euclidian line segment subdivision.