Oxford Journals
tools journals homepage advanced search contact help
Journal of Logic and Computation: Current Issue
 
home
browse
current
etoc
authors
subinfo
subscribers
samples

OUP > Journals > Computing/Engineer. & Mathematics/Stats. > Journal of Logic and Computation

Journal of Logic and Computation

Volume 12, Issue 3, June 2002: pp. 371-412

Two Logical Theories of Plan Recognition

Wayne Wobcke1

1School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia. E-mail: wobcke@cse.unsw.edu.au

We present a logical approach to plan recognition that builds on Kautz's theory of keyhole plan recognition, defined as the problem of inferring descriptions of high-level plans from a set of descriptions of observed, typically low-level, actions. Kautz's approach is based on a formalization of the structural information contained in an abstraction/decomposition hierarchy of plan schemas: the inferred plans are selected by an observer agent from amongst those that can be generated from this hierarchy. In this paper, we present two logics for plan recognition. The first theory, like Kautz's, is monotonic, meaning that all possible plans compatible with the observations are treated as equally plausible by the observer. The second theory is based on rejecting this simplifying assumption, and is nonmonotonic. To develop this theory, we adapt ideas from belief revision and conditional logic to define plan recognition inference as a nonmonotonic consequence operation based on an observer's plausibility ordering on the possible plans. The logics incorporate a sound and complete theory of temporal intervals based on Allen's approach, enabling the plan recognition agent to handle temporal information relating multiple observations. An underlying motivation for our work is to provide an intuitive semantic interpretation of plans using situation semantics and to interpret plan recognition as inference over courses of events.

Keywords: Plan recognition; nonmonotonic reasoning; belief revision

Table of Contents   Full-Text PDF (434 KB)

Oxford University Press
Published by Oxford University Press
Copyright ©Oxford University Press 2003
Print ISSN: 0955-792X  Online ISSN: 1465-363X.
Oxford University Press Privacy Policy and Legal Statement